Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 21:41:47 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Bryan Drewery <bryan@shatow.net> Cc: Kenta Suzumoto <kentas@hush.com>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, William Grzybowski <william88@gmail.com> Subject: Re: sysutils/fusefs-kmod needs a poke Message-ID: <20131002024147.GB28855@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20131001213825.GD66839@admin.xzibition.com> References: <20130930211343.D5EB920360@smtp.hushmail.com> <5249FCEC.5050805@FreeBSD.org> <20130930224641.BD5BA20360@smtp.hushmail.com> <524A02D1.60105@FreeBSD.org> <20131001005813.57AD020361@smtp.hushmail.com> <CAHtVNLMiXXcPj7%2BrgTCRAvTJkV21g5oJCibYGdTXP8ZBDjJ_Pw@mail.gmail.com> <20131001213825.GD66839@admin.xzibition.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:05:52PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > Hi, > > Due to the bureaucracy involved its always best if you file a pr > (send-pr(1)) reporting the issue. Unless a portmgr steps in to fix the > problem. It may seem like bureaucracy to folks, but it's a deliberately chosen compromise between stepping on the toes of people who are temporarily busy, and getting work done promptly. It's the best we have right now. In the meantime, if anyone wants to look at the list of unmaintained ports to help maintain some, as usual it is available at: http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portsconcordanceformaintainer.py?maintainer=ports%40FreeBSD.org fwiw, Number of ports with no maintainer: 4285 (17.6%), so the page will take a while to load. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131002024147.GB28855>