Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 00:26:35 -0500 From: Kaarthik Sivakumar <kaarthik@comcast.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xemacs-devel port Message-ID: <86oeqmq0hg.fsf@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <200403231920.i2NJK4Bx004045@peedub.jennejohn.org> (Gary Jennejohn's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2004 20:20:04 %2B0100") References: <200403231920.i2NJK4Bx004045@peedub.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> "GJ" == Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org> writes: GJ> Wouldn't hurt since I, the maintainer, can't get into freefall to GJ> do any commits. Ok, I will file a pr. GJ> This is really a nit! xemacs has bigger problems, but what the GJ> heck. I know, but a user did mention on the xemacs-beta mailing list that 21.5 is gamma and that raised concerns there about our packaging. So.. What bigger problems do you see with xemacs? I run compiled-from-source xemacs 21.5.x and other than standard beta software problems with xemacs in general (ie not FreeBSD specific), everything seems ok. I use compiled-from-source 21.4 at work and that is quite good. kaarthik
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86oeqmq0hg.fsf>