Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Jul 1996 17:20:13 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu>
To:        Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
Cc:        Stefan Esser <se@zpr.uni-koeln.de>, andreas@klemm.gtn.com, ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports/print/ghostscript4
Message-ID:  <Pine.OSF.3.91.960730171731.18093E-100000@fiber.eng.umd.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960731001207.2694G-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 31 Jul 1996, Narvi wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 30 Jul 1996, Chuck Robey wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 30 Jul 1996, Stefan Esser wrote:
> > 
> > >  > Problems like this should be real easily fixable - or will something more 
> > >  > than the number in the filename have to change in the makefile?
> > > 
> > > Sure. But what I meant to say was, that if only
> > > the name of a distribution files changes, then 
> > > we should generally keep the old name in the 
> > > port's Makefile, in order to reduce unneccesary
> > > multi-megabyte FTP transfers.
> > > 
> > > A note might be required in the Makefile, which
> > > indicates that the TAR file remains unchanged 
> > > and thus the version from the previous release
> > > will still be used ...
> > 
> > I'm not sure I agree with this.  The old tar file is very likely to 
> > become much harder to get, and keeping parts of older versions, to 
> > balance off ftp loading time, well, I think this isn't wise.  I think it 
> > would just cause much more confusion than the time saved, for the largest 
> > number of people.
> 
> It is not the case actually - there are cases when there is no newer 
> file, just a link with the new name to the old file...

I realize it's a case the the same data, new name, but it's the new name 
that I think is important.  Those of us that know enough, can simply 
rename the darn thing in our ports/distfiles, and I think that we owe 
that much to our less sophisticated users, not to inject gratuitous 
confusion.  This is too much of a hack for it to be institutionalized.

----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Chuck Robey                 | Interests include any kind of voice or data 
chuckr@eng.umd.edu          | communications topic, C programming, and Unix.
9120 Edmonston Ct #302      |
Greenbelt, MD 20770         | I run Journey2 and n3lxx, both FreeBSD
(301) 220-2114              | version 2.2 current -- and great FUN!
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.91.960730171731.18093E-100000>