Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:48:08 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: "Gerald Pfeifer" <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LIB_DEPENDS not really required for build? Message-ID: <cb5206420702040448j440930efi8c624dbb48abd88@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702041324130.10525@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702031408170.10525@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <cb5206420702040358j33ad5a0ev4827852e45497e05@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702041324130.10525@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/4/07, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote: > On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > You should take another look at the excerpt you > > posted. Looks like portsdir has been redefined. > > Yes, PORTSDIR has been redefined to point to where my ports reside. ;-) > > I fully understand that I am missing these dependencies. They simply do > not exist on that system. > > My complaint is that the build should stop immediately, with a clear error > message, instead of forging ahead and silently do the wrong thing or fail > at a later stage, during build, installation, or run-time. It's been written in big red letters that partial/broken ports trees are not supported.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420702040448j440930efi8c624dbb48abd88>