Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 16:27:01 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Stable branch Message-ID: <39E021C5.1F5DEE48@newsguy.com> References: <4.3.2.20001007161924.00b72460@207.227.119.2> <4.3.2.20001007214506.00bb7c10@207.227.119.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jeffrey J. Mountin" wrote: > > One other idea that cropped up would be if we want to set this up for the > more troublesome releases like 3.2 to force them to upgrade to a later > version. Think that only 3.4+ should be considered due to a large enough > install base to consider. Err... we would consider only for 4.2+. This is not something we can go back and do for previous versions without going insane. New model, new versions. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@linux.bsdconspiracy.net the ants all left because mtn. dew is sold out again To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39E021C5.1F5DEE48>