Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 18:09:48 +1000 (Australia/ACT) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: scott@lampert.org (Scott Lampert), security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pf OR ipf ? Message-ID: <200204070809.SAA06353@caligula.anu.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <20020406214253.H70207@blossom.cjclark.org> from "Crist J. Clark" at Apr 06, 2002 09:42:54 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Crist J. Clark, sie said: > > It's in 5.0-CURRENT so it may make 5.0-RELEASE. ;) I do not plan to > merge the code into 4.x-STABLE in its current form. I really am not > happy with how it works in -CURRENT either, but to get it to work more > cleanly and in a way darrenr suggested, I'd need to modify IPFilter > code, which I have tried to avoid. So the -CURRENT code is > experimental, but that's OK for -CURRENT. It's not OK for -STABLE. Ack. what was it that I suggested (that needed ipfilter code changed) ? Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204070809.SAA06353>