Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:05:10 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> Cc: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start. Message-ID: <20030825180510.70A042A8D1@canning.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <20030821163749.GC11682@spc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:11:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > What do people think? Can we loose these type of warnings? I'm not sure > > what their need is. The beauty of RCng is that I can say I want Amd (for > <snip> > > I agree with you, but perhaps the warnings should be preserved elsewhere? > Or toggleable via an rc.conf switch? This might sound silly, but how about hide them (and some of the other messages) behind the 'sysctl debug.bootverbose' value? It kinda makes sense for 'boot -v' to put *all* of the boot process into verbose mode.. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030825180510.70A042A8D1>