Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 06:10:40 +0100 (CET) From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?=" <giffunip@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: flex vs POSIX Message-ID: <20030116051040.74303.qmail@web13407.mail.yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
Hi;
I'm reading the flex(1) manpage, in particular the
section "INCOMPATIBILITIES WITH LEX AND POSIX". I hate
to suggest this for the performance implications it
might bring, but for compliance reasons perhaps the -l
option (maximum compatibility) should be turned on
when flex is called as lex.
cheers,
Pedro.
ps. Of course... this could break a lot of stuff if
done right now.
______________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture message per il tuo telefonino
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/?http://it.mobile.yahoo.com/index2002.html
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030116051040.74303.qmail>