Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:48:57 -0500 From: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix? Message-ID: <cone.1172422137.380925.68971.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <cone.1171556679.453588.55347.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <i2hat2l2ml6q1bfhv1t8ja63ghu5jdkocv@4ax.com> <cone.1171743956.652183.78181.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <200702172201.l1HM1BnR009915@lava.sentex.ca> <cone.1171915729.745199.41200.5001@35st.simplicato.com> <200702192021.l1JKLAkQ021489@lava.sentex.ca> <cone.1171921551.955158.41200.5001@35st.simplicato.com> <200702192231.l1JMVoWG022055@lava.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Tancsa writes: > Strange, our daemons dont grow that large. Are you using LDAP lookups > or something like that compiled against it ? Looking at one box, > running a dev version Again this is my frustration with ClamAv. Some versions behave great, but as we upgrade some versions had serious problems like growing over 512MB in memory usage. > and a version .90 started last Friday shows 74MB of mem usage. Tried .90 shortly after the port was done and had nothing but problems. Going to try it with the alternate threading library suggested earlier in the thread.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cone.1172422137.380925.68971.1000>