Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 12:29:08 +0300 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com> Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxcb message - is it still relevant Message-ID: <AANLkTinUI0JZOF4msIskhWYn2roSbT8hRaWE8Ra0_POu@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimGINDoWbxaf0QoEDya0L4GAQ1cxWk5yPCT2VH2@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTik9QWWpfXamvkp6yQA8GhoyQ639G7Lcfdv2vOHA@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimGINDoWbxaf0QoEDya0L4GAQ1cxWk5yPCT2VH2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos <unixmania@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: >> As far as I could tell xcb is currently the default Xlib. Is the >> following message that libXcb is experimental still true? ... > > No, but if the - informal - experiments I made are correct the claims > about "dramatic improvements in speed" are an exaggeration. It would be nice if the message were removed. About the speed - what kind of experiments did you perform?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinUI0JZOF4msIskhWYn2roSbT8hRaWE8Ra0_POu>