Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:40:25 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@gmail.com> Cc: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek@freebsd.org>, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb/173666: [USB, LIBUSB] usb_reset() behavior different between GNU/Linux and FreeBSD Message-ID: <201212231040.25892.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <CAGjSPUCuDUTMTn427v=GWdLqm3LcSM7OR1nFpVoyXgba%2BtX3dQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201211162247.qAGMlTm2057387@red.freebsd.org> <201212210838.32260.hselasky@c2i.net> <CAGjSPUCuDUTMTn427v=GWdLqm3LcSM7OR1nFpVoyXgba%2BtX3dQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 22 December 2012 11:17:15 Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> wrote: > > If you look in the old libusb-0.1 code you'll see something different I > > think. Could you check that? > > Not much differences in reality. I believe it is a document bug for the > libusb-0.1. > > Both old libusb-0.1 code and libusb-1.0 use the same IOCTL under Linux > and the behavior should be similar. > > Please refer to the following code listing and take note even though > the name of the IOCTL is different but they are the same if you > look at the defines. Can you create a thread for this at the libusb lists? --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201212231040.25892.hselasky>