Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:24:01 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-doc-projects@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Subject: Re: svn commit: r40000 - projects/pkgng/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports Message-ID: <201212121124.01664.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20121115181349.GB1354@glenbarber.us> References: <201211151440.qAFEeLYN099713@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1211151304590.2164@multics.mit.edu> <20121115181349.GB1354@glenbarber.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:13:49 pm Glen Barber wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > Isn't the actual application just "pkg"? It's unclear to what extent we > > really need to be talking about pkgng using the string "pkgng". > > > > The name of the application is pkgng. The name of the command is pkg. This is not a very future proof name. Do we get pkgngng next, or will it be pkgds9? I think pkgng is fine for a WIP name, but once it moves to production status it should really just be called 'pkg'. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201212121124.01664.jhb>