Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:38:11 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@freebsd.org, Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [patch] PH tells crap about GMAKE (Was: Re: svn commit: r340018 - head/textproc/scew) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401251735370.2111@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401240922210.87046@wonkity.com> References: <201401170910.s0H9Aw9O087448@svn.freebsd.org> <20140117093546.GA16656@FreeBSD.org> <20140117095020.GD4006@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20140117141440.GA94157@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401240922210.87046@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >> Please consider attached patch. It is not a polished gem, and most likely >> would need a review and wordsmithing from doc@ guys. >> >> While here I've also standardized the spelling of "okay", and fixed couple >> of grammar nits. These changes are not related to GMAKE ones, and probably >> should be committed separately, but I'm not splitting the diff for personal >> convenience, sorry. :) > > Attached is a quick editing pass. I have not tested it for building yet, and > edited the diff directly, so it has some a new blank line. I would like to be more specific in this part: Quite often, a specific implementation is required, like GNU make, or legacy FreeBSD make. I think that should say: Quite often, a specific implementation is required, like GNU make (gmake), or legacy FreeBSD make (fmake). Is that correct? Thanks!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1401251735370.2111>