Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:56:10 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Cedric GROSS <cg@cgross.info> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [IWN] Review Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomWAMEEie8zK=p6Z=X%2BgDb71Y7nzyuh_upeKZZ%2BADsaDw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <002e01cec8f0$71c400e0$554c02a0$@info> References: <002701cebc6f$634c0040$29e400c0$@info> <CAJ-VmonSS9Y9X0=3XndD-JX6boSW7NcGXwyv0Ra3e5%2B0UEaUhg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmom_YD-1p85hNfAQBte9AjfZ7N6U-=%2B%2Bc4qw9VZcSKB66g@mail.gmail.com> <003301cebdeb$fc941350$f5bc39f0$@info> <1381762883.2593.0.camel@localhost> <002e01cec8f0$71c400e0$554c02a0$@info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok, so what, I should test out split_8, get that into the tree, then merge in more stuff from you? -adrian On 14 October 2013 08:17, Cedric GROSS <cg@cgross.info> wrote: > > De : Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_bruno@yahoo.com] > > =C0 : Cedric GROSS > > Cc : 'Adrian Chadd'; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org > > Objet : RE: [IWN] Review > > > > On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote: > > > Hello, > > > I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now. > > > > > > So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD. > > > Cedric > > > > Cedric: > Hi Sean, > > > > > Which branch should we be testing? > > > > As Adrian wish to smoothly include changes into FreeBSD repo, split_6 an > split_7 doesn't change big things regarding latest NIC. > > Instead Split_8, is minimal version for managing 2200 and so on NIC serie= s. > Could be a good idea to test this version with =E0 lot of NIC. > > > sean > > Thanks > Cedric > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomWAMEEie8zK=p6Z=X%2BgDb71Y7nzyuh_upeKZZ%2BADsaDw>