Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:19:25 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: sys/kern/subr_disk.c and sys/geom/sched/subr_disk.c - is it intentional now? Message-ID: <301293893.20101217171925@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Freebsd-geom. I've found, that these two files doesn't have any differencr but function names & one diaganostic function in "generic" version. Is it intentional or it is artefact of times when "geom_sched" was experemental code? No comments in "geom_sched-private" version is givent and it seems as copy'n'paste which is dangerous -- for example, any changes in one file should be transferred into other (or not?). Explanation of this situation in header of sys/geom/sched/subr_disk.c is good idea, IMHO. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?301293893.20101217171925>