Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 18:45:07 -0700 From: bmah@FreeBSD.org (Bruce A. Mah) To: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@ark.cris.net> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org>, doc@FreeBSD.org, nik@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml Message-ID: <200206030145.g531j7VY045429@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20020601183147.C55534@ark.cris.net> References: <200205302048.g4UKmDh27423@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020531121313.A20879@ark.cris.net> <200205311443.g4VEhUPi002113@intruder.bmah.org> <20020601183147.C55534@ark.cris.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If memory serves me right, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > > (It used to be that all versions of the release notes referenced the > > manpages for the most recent release. Clearly that doesn't work.) > Currently no, but who can stop you from modifying existing DSL to make > it reality ? [patch snipped] Hmmm...interesting! This patch not only changes the DSL (which is fine), but it introduces a new element in the DTD (which I have a problem with). The longcitrefentry element is something that would only exist on FreeBSD, and nowhere else, making us (in yet another way) different from any other DocBook-using project. There's some precedent for trying to avoid this; we got rid of the <port> element some months ago for exactly this reason. Don't get me wrong...I am in agreement with you that there's a bit of an odd situation. I am just not crazy about the proposed solution...unfortunately I don't have any better ideas at the moment! Other thoughts? Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206030145.g531j7VY045429>