Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:06:32 +0000
From:      "onwahe-gmail-com (Svatopluk Kraus)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   [Differential] [Commented On] D3034: Add BUS_UNMASK_INTR method
Message-ID:  <f02d40426c114670fdee0c0374d8508d@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-knxjlihey7dhpvtvtsyg-req@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-knxjlihey7dhpvtvtsyg-req@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
onwahe-gmail-com added a subscriber: onwahe-gmail-com.
onwahe-gmail-com added a comment.

Well, I do not like to change bus interface so fast. What about to think of PPI on each core like separate interrupt with its irq number, counter, handler, and handler argument. This way bus_setup_intr will be called only once for PPI on each core.  Of course, some coding is needed in nexus and/or interrupt framework.

Sadly, there is a new interrupt framework waiting for review for long time. Thus, this thing could be already discussed without such hurry.


REPOSITORY
  rS FreeBSD src repository

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3034

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: wma_semihalf.com, emaste, imp, ian, andrew, zbb
Cc: onwahe-gmail-com, freebsd-arm-list, meloun-miracle-cz, imp, andrew, emaste



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f02d40426c114670fdee0c0374d8508d>