Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:45:21 +0100 (CET) From: "Remko Lodder" <remko@elvandar.org> To: "Murray Stokely" <murray@stokely.org> Cc: doceng@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docproj port needs to use tidy-devel Message-ID: <47849.194.74.82.3.1200552321.squirrel@galain.elvandar.org> In-Reply-To: <2a7894eb0801162124x76d7132y8de9f4a1d314d8aa@mail.gmail.com> References: <2a7894eb0801162124x76d7132y8de9f4a1d314d8aa@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, January 17, 2008 6:24 am, Murray Stokely wrote: > Is there any reason not to update the docproj port to use tidy-devel > rather > than tidy? The released version of tidy is nearly 8 years old and > produces > xhtml that doesn't validate. The newer -devel releases produce more > correct > xhtml. > - Murray > > I think the problem at some point was that tidy-devel was a 'quick' moving target which got updated often and is missing a few things that we would like to have included in the tidy we use (Certain flags, but I cannot recall which of them exactly), I recall speaking with Hiroki about this (if I remember this correctly; it was more then 1.5years ago at least :-)) Note that I would also like to see that we use tidy-devel instead of tidy... :-) Cheers remko -- /"\ Best regards, | remko@FreeBSD.org \ / Remko Lodder | remko@EFnet X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47849.194.74.82.3.1200552321.squirrel>