Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 04:39:18 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: "Neal E. Westfall" <nwestfal@directvinternet.com> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why did evolution fail? Message-ID: <20020907013917.GC16913@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <20020906181354.C44831-100000@Tolstoy.home.lan> References: <20020907002242.GC15779@hades.hell.gr> <20020906181354.C44831-100000@Tolstoy.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20020906181354.C44831-100000@Tolstoy.home.lan>
"Neal E. Westfall" <nwestfal@directvinternet.com> wrote:
>
> Correction. Logic and ethics are meaningless without objective
> standards, and objective standards are impossible without appealing
> to something, well, *objective*. "Objective" means that it comes to
> you from the outside, externally, i.e. "not subjective". So
> immediately the opinions of men are eliminated. What is left?
The team. The sum of a dozen people, is more than a dozen people.
A team can define what is objective, without a need for anything
supernatural.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020907013917.GC16913>