Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:10:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus Message-ID: <200310101710.h9AHAEC0096503@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
The following reply was made to PR docs/57824; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Cc: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:03:31 -0400 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:20:29 +0300 Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:00:51PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > [...] > > > > >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386 > > > > > > It's fixed for the next release; is it normal to MFC something > > > this trivial to a past release branch? The GENERIC config file > > > explains what devices require miibus(4). So does the handbook, > > > and the LINT file. > > > > I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9. > > Erm... What do you mean, 'wait'? What Tom is saying is that > the branch currently referred to as -STABLE, which *is* what was > formerly known as 4.8-STABLE, but is right now called 4.9-RC due > to the pending 4.9-RELEASE -- well, that branch already documents > that ed needs miibus. I can also confirm that: my ed(4) manpage > shows 'device miibus' in the synopsis section. > > This was already MFC'd in ed.4 rev. 1.19.2.10 from February 17th, > committed by - surprise, surprise - Tom Rhodes :) I've done so much -doc that I completely forgot that I did this! Thanks for pointing this out, I think this PR can be closed now. What does our submitter say? -- Tom Rhodeshome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310101710.h9AHAEC0096503>