Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:42:16 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp Message-ID: <20030924174216.GL650@saboteur.dek.spc.org> In-Reply-To: <20030925012033.A567@grosbein.pp.ru> References: <200309241429.h8OETrhk097904@freefall.freebsd.org> <3F71ADCA.7090408@tenebras.com> <20030924162111.GA23542@sunbay.com> <3F71C733.6070708@tenebras.com> <20030924170442.GC23542@sunbay.com> <20030925012033.A567@grosbein.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 01:20:33AM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:04:42PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Right. But static ARP means something different. It means > > that the APR table is frozen, but system will still reply > > to ARP requests for its addresses, which is not done if > > IFF_NOARP flag is set on an interface. > > Realization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/40763 > > In production for years. Of course, it is better to apply patch from SA. Thanks for your PR. I'll review this along with ru's patch once I get it. BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030924174216.GL650>