Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:12:29 +1000 From: Stephen McKay <smckay@internode.on.net> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CTM - any users left? Message-ID: <200306200612.h5K6CTgK005609@dungeon.home> In-Reply-To: <200306170856.h5H8uoHh097154@grimreaper.grondar.org> from Mark Murray at "Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:56:50 %2B0100" References: <200306170856.h5H8uoHh097154@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, 17th June 2003, Mark Murray wrote: >The real datapoint I was looking for was any objections. There were some, >mainly of the form "I use it so please keep it in base". Only one so far >has been a "hard" objection, the rest have pretty much said "I can see why >you want to do this" and "makes sense, cvsup(1) is not in base". Cvsup is also the baby of one particular person, so it has a well-defined home. If ctm is removed from the base system, where does its source live? Who has access to that repository? In particular, do *I* have access to that repository (since I occasionally work on ctm)? If these things are more than trivial to handle then it is easier all round to leave it where it is. It's small, after all. Stephen.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200306200612.h5K6CTgK005609>