Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:37:28 +0300 From: "Alexander Churanov" <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com> To: "Roman Divacky" <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: Andrew Reilly <andrew-freebsd@areilly.bpc-users.org>, Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler? Message-ID: <3cb459ed0901091537ld9858beq9a8428be9c900fab@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090109230252.GA37323@freebsd.org> References: <20090108233311.GA69883@keltia.freenix.fr> <49672189.5060109@gmx.de> <20090109110508.GA12123@freebsd.org> <496751D1.20605@gmx.de> <20090109134725.GA38233@freebsd.org> <49675F04.20006@gmx.de> <3cb459ed0901091412o5861ec59web9b48d264ca053b@mail.gmail.com> <20090109222211.GA33145@freebsd.org> <3cb459ed0901091453i2144419fyede5894ae411a259@mail.gmail.com> <20090109230252.GA37323@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/1/10 Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> > ie. no strong need for -pedantic as far as I can tell :) > > honestly... we need some of the gnu99 features and it's only a good thing > that > the alternative compilers support that, I also have a gut feeling that (as > it > was in the past) some of the gnu99 things might appear in the next C > standard > > Well, since standards aim to document existing practice and not to invent things, your assumption sounds very reasonable. However, adoption of gcc extensions means that behavior of gcc is de-facto standard, more respected than ISO, for a group of developers. Sincerely, Alexander Churanov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3cb459ed0901091537ld9858beq9a8428be9c900fab>