Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 19:46:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230258] [FUSE] [BUG]: Attributes caching issue Message-ID: <bug-230258-227-uwJqK7Pn6U@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-230258-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-230258-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230258 Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |cem@freebsd.org --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki from comment #4) > We've mentioned 'fuse_lowlevel_notify_inval_entry' only because it could = be > used as a work-around. We do not use this function in our current > implementation. Understood, just wanted to clarify why you saw the error message. It's interesting you mention O_APPEND. I forgot about it, but that was tot= ally broken (even on individual files) in 11.0 and I fixed it in CURRENT (r32045= 1) June 2017. It looks like MarkJ MFC'd the commit to 11 July 2017 (r320684) = and also to 11.1 (r320689). So if you are actually running 11.0 and not 11.1 p= er the PR Version field, I'd encourage you to try 11.1 :-). I can't do it now, but I'll look into the timeout value and our file size caching a little more later (maybe tonight). Thanks for the detailed report with repro, your help with investigating, an= d of course, patience. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-230258-227-uwJqK7Pn6U>