Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 08:02:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: build tools as separate distribution Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10009090801290.63380-100000@login-1.eunet.no> In-Reply-To: <200009071619.e87GJEG16236@billy-club.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : On the note of shrinking stuff, I am wondering what, if anything, came of > : the previous discussion regarding the introduction of BUILD_TINY or > : similar defines? > What would these do? My intention, which others had voiced as well, was to try to agree upon a define to add which would cut down various parts of the system to minimal functional sets. For example, one could build sh with this defined, and a number of functions would suddenly not get built into it. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10009090801290.63380-100000>