Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:04:28 -0200 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: Jim Pingle <lists@pingle.org> Cc: rsmith@xs4all.nl, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loosing spam fight Message-ID: <200701271304.29216.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <45BB6296.1080106@pingle.org> References: <8a20e5000701240903q35b89e14k1ab977df62411784@mail.gmail.com> <20070127141052.GA96039@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <45BB6296.1080106@pingle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:32, Jim Pingle wrote: > Roland Smith wrote: > > Most spammers do not bother to return if they get a resend request. > > That's the whole point of doing this. So practically it doesn't increase > > bandwidth consumption. > =2E.. > Greylisting is a decent idea, but it seems to me that it's just another > tool in the ongoing arms race against spammers. It may work for a while, > but eventually they'll catch on and it will only cause unnecessary delays > for legitimate mail. > finally some cares about the users here, that is a really important point, = how=20 do you justify that your client get the email he is waiting for an hour=20 later? Probably he looks then for a better service provider ... =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701271304.29216.joao>