Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:30:42 +0000 From: Geoff Buckingham <geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com> To: Michal Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LSB runtime compliance? Message-ID: <20040414083042.GA57420@chuggalug.clues.com> In-Reply-To: <20040413145658.GB96467@pasternak.w.lub.pl> References: <20040413142348.GB31567@chuggalug.clues.com> <20040413145658.GB96467@pasternak.w.lub.pl>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 04:56:58PM +0200, Michal Pasternak wrote: > Geoff Buckingham [Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 02:23:48PM +0000]: > > After that problems were mainley around paths. Is it possible to force linux > > binaries to only look for files under /compat/linux ? > > chroot / jail ? possibley but having looked through the lsb runtime requirements, I thought it desirable to use native FreeBSD e2fsprogs binaries, maybe linux binaries could be used. Does /compat/linux/dev self populate under current and devfs? Not sure if their would be other cases where native binaries would be prefered?help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040414083042.GA57420>