Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:08:24 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org> Cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Pre-commit review requested Message-ID: <20030910110824.6caa54e4.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030908223058.GD19937@unixpages.org> References: <20030908142254.3592ed0d.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030908223058.GD19937@unixpages.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:30:59 +0200 Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:22:54PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > Any -doc committer want to review the following patch. It is by no > > way an in depth cleanup, but it will take us (myself anyway) one > > step further toward my goal of a good security chapter. > > > > This diff: > > > > o Adds <application>, <acronym>, and other tags as required. > > o Uses the &os; entity. > > o Cleans up the introduction by pointing out what > > version of Kerberos is in what FreeBSD Release. > > o Modifies <indexterm> and title's to help seperate KerberosIV and Kerberos5. > > > > I'm only looking for either objections or "please commit"s and would rather > > not bounce this around for the next three days. Thanks! > > > > [patch] > > Looks good to me. > Yes, it looks good. But there is a problem, it breaks. Notice the unclosed tags which I neglected, but my make lint pre-commit test actually caught that. :) -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030910110824.6caa54e4.trhodes>