Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:28:21 -0500 From: Chris BeHanna <chris@pennasoft.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5-STABLE Roadmap Message-ID: <200302140028.21669.chris@pennasoft.com> In-Reply-To: <25c301c2d3e1$8f2e3e30$52557f42@errno.com> References: <200302140036.h1E0aK3q071051@freefall.freebsd.org> <a05200f0dba72122437d7@[10.0.1.2]> <25c301c2d3e1$8f2e3e30$52557f42@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 13 February 2003 11:28 pm, Sam Leffler wrote: > > At 4:36 PM -0800 2003/02/13, Scott Long wrote: > > > - the classic 'worldstone' > > > - webstone - /usr/ports/www/webstone > > > - Fstress - http://www.cs.duke.edu/ari/fstress > > > - ApacheBench - /usr/ports/www/p5-ApacheBench > > > - netperf - /usr/ports/benchmarks/netperf > > > > Are there any other benchmarks that are being considered? What > > about LMBench? RawIO? Bonnie++? Other disk benchmarks? Do we care > > about application-layer benchmarks for other protocols, such as SMTP, > > POP3, or IMAP? > > > > Just curious. Thanks! > > This can quickly turn into a bikeshed, but suggest ones. We're looking for > good benchmarks. lmbench, rawio, and bonniee are rather "micro" in nature > (not bad, just limited in their usefulness). SpecFS (NFS ops/sec benchmark) -- Chris BeHanna http://www.pennasoft.com Principal Consultant PennaSoft Corporation chris@pennasoft.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302140028.21669.chris>