Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:47:14 -0700 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= <ask@develooper.com> To: Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "kernel: carp_input: received len 20 < sizeof(struct carp_header)" messages Message-ID: <77F1671C-33AE-4AAB-8442-7653B00F7E04@develooper.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD36BD0.4040409@tomjudge.com> References: <17903237-CBF6-4CC3-8CA3-29D9BB65538F@develooper.com> <4CD36BD0.4040409@tomjudge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 4, 2010, at 19:28, Tom Judge wrote: >> I checked that we don't have any overlapping vhid/vrid IDs. Any idea for how to either just suppress the log message from the kernel or getting it to log some more details so we can try to make the underlying problem go away? >> > > Take a look at the following page: > > http://www.tomjudge.com/index.php/FreeBSD/CARP_vs_VRRP > > It contains a patch to change the CARP protocol ID to something that is > not used so these messages go away. Hi Tom, Thank you for the reply. I was hoping we wouldn't have to rebuild the kernel (doh) since we use a basically abandoned version of pfSense (the pfSense team are for all their efforts and good work seemingly unable to get a new release out the door). I agree that it was pretty dumb of the OpenBSD developers to just stomp on another protocol ID for their (and ours in FreeBSD ...) implementation. - ask -- http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?77F1671C-33AE-4AAB-8442-7653B00F7E04>