Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:58:27 +0000 From: "Teske, Devin" <Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com> To: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, Devin Teske <dteske@FreeBSD.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "Teske, Devin" <Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r256343 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall: . scripts Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FC5BB95@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> In-Reply-To: <5258F9B3.7030101@freebsd.org> References: <201310112041.r9BKfZeT002056@svn.freebsd.org> <5258F9B3.7030101@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 12, 2013, at 12:26 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 10/11/13 22:41, Devin Teske wrote: >> Author: dteske >> Date: Fri Oct 11 20:41:35 2013 >> New Revision: 256343 >> URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=3Dhttp://svnweb.freebsd.= org/changeset/base/256343&k=3D%2FbkpAUdJWZuiTILCq%2FFnQg%3D%3D%0A&r=3DMrjs6= vR4%2Faj2Ns9%2FssHJjg%3D%3D%0A&m=3DLDzuPpXPP4D5BzfISZjw%2BXitYn4aKVzfXzcrmM= NFo2U%3D%0A&s=3D3d0963d9c497f7bad0918888032ca62844580612dc48ab3a8a6768fe640= c365b >>=20 >> Log: >> Add zfsboot module as an option for automatic configuration. Default is >> to run interactively but it can be scripted too (optinally completely >> non-interactive). Currently supports GELI and all ZFS vdev types. Also >> performs validation on selections/settings providing error messages if >> necessary, explaining (in plain language) what the issue is. Currently >> the auto partitioning of naked disks only supports GPT and MBR (VTOC8 >> pending for sparc64), so is only available for i386/amd64 install. >>=20 >> Submitted by: Allan Jude <freebsd@allanjude.com>, myself >> Reviewed by: Allan Jude <freebsd@allanjude.com> >> Approved by: re (glebius) >=20 > Hi Devin -- >=20 > As was discussed on the mailing list, this patch still has some issues > that need to be resolved, Can you kindly provide links? I'm crawling through the mailing lists and not finding anything for the October, (current, stable, sysinstall, ... ?? = others?) Do I need to be looking back in September? I wouldn't think so, because that bit wasn't even in our development tree until October 1st: http://druidbsd.cvs.sf.net/viewvc/druidbsd/bsdinstall_zfs/usr.sbin%3A%3Absd= config%3A%3Ashare%3A%3Adevice.subr.patch?revision=3D1.1&view=3Dmarkup So there couldn't have been any discussion on it before then. So I'm just n= ot able to find the mailing lists where all the action is that they're discuss= ing it. Would be nice to find where the action is, so I could participate. > for example the use of camcontrol > unconditionally even when the disks may not be CAM Allan Adds: 9.2 should have all disks listed in camcontrol, so it shouldn't be an issue And: I think the only systems without cam based disks are old 8.x - we're only t= argeting 10 anyway. I tend to agree with those statements. > and destruction of > existing sub-partitioning for MBR disks. I think we both (Allan and I) actually responded directly to you on this on= e. We have code that handles that. It's in there. --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FC5BB95>