Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:09:52 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de> Cc: "Erik U." <erik.u@dnainternet.net> Subject: Re: Mysterious 60min reboot on net4501 Message-ID: <20040317060951.GF4991@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <200403170653.34932.h@schmalzbauer.de> References: <200403162024.31782.h@schmalzbauer.de> <200403162036.04418.h@schmalzbauer.de> <20040316233525.GD4991@cicely12.cicely.de> <200403170653.34932.h@schmalzbauer.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 06:53:30AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 17. März 2004 00:35 schrieb Bernd Walter: > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:35:58PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 16. März 2004 20:29 schrieb Erik U.: > > > > Maybe something in the crontab that runs hourly and crashes your > > > > system. > > > > > > Cron doesn't run at all. > > > > > > If it only was that simple..... > > > > Maybe a too small power supply - current utilizes the CPU a bit more > > and therefor requires more power. > > At least -current never gave me such problems with soekris boards. > > You are right, ther also was a problem with the power supply but I had > replaced the old one by a 6V/2A model. I'm astonished about the 60 min > interval. What bug could caus this? Today I'll revert all the "newies" like > crypto hw/support aso. Why do you think it's a bug? Maybe some intervall loads the CPU more than the remaining time. The elan520 has a very load dependend power consumption. I don't know what happens special at 60min uptime - maybe something simple like named cache garbadge collection or so. The hifn chip consume a lot of power independend of beeing used or not, so removing kernel support for it won't help much. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040317060951.GF4991>