Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 May 2016 12:45:15 +0100
From:      Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
To:        Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net>, Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Cc:        freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Are there SPARC [or other] aligned memory access requirements to avoid exceptions? [now that 11.0's armv6/v7 is allowing more unaligned accesses]
Message-ID:  <5748334B.6070504@ilande.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <C15677FD-F3D2-4EC1-AD10-606780880B87@dsl-only.net>
References:  <7AFD3661-9764-434B-A387-FD31B62DD77E@dsl-only.net> <CALXu0Uer=nOKBvd8x%2Bf=7F36603LRpkarAY4QOqau-4n_sLqQw@mail.gmail.com> <F79AE83A-B973-4FA1-BC6C-18FC24F6C41F@dsl-only.net> <CALXu0Uc2Ssqs5OzCpTZs0Mcy4Y0ZQBzKAJPpT1LjnMoD-8updg@mail.gmail.com> <5747F78A.5020103@gmx.de> <C15677FD-F3D2-4EC1-AD10-606780880B87@dsl-only.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On 27/05/16 12:35, Mark Millard wrote:

>> 1 - figure if this affects other RISC architectures.  Cedric got the
>> SPARC on the hook, but I'm open for input on other arch's.
>>
>> If someone can report back if the lzo2 port runs into
>> unaligned-access-emulation traps on FreeBSD/sparc*, that would be
>> helpful. I do not have access to SPARC computers any more.
> 
> I also have no access to any SPARC variants.

If you grab yourself a copy of the latest QEMU 2.6, you should be able
to happily install FreeBSD-current under qemu-system-sparc64 in
-nographic mode. The emulation is still a work-in-progress but one of
its primary use cases is allow people to generate builds even if they
don't have access to the real hardware.


ATB,

Mark.



home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5748334B.6070504>