Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 May 2003 10:59:04 +0300
From:      "Petri Helenius" <pete@he.iki.fi>
To:        "Daniel Eischen" <eischen@pcnet.com>
Cc:        freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: malloc(): error: recursive call
Message-ID:  <023f01c325b8$2cf96d60$812a40c1@PETEX31>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.10.10305282124570.11882-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> Note that if you are using my other spinlock patch
> (from http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/kse/spinlock.diffs),
> that also solves the problem but in a slightly different
> way.  That patch forces the library to reference the
> spinlock functions (the new spinlock implementation needs
> some initialization), so the table of references doesn't
> need to be changed (like the patch in the prior email does).
> 
Will either one of the patches make it to 5.1-RELEASE, please?

Pete



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?023f01c325b8$2cf96d60$812a40c1>