Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 06:50:29 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/geom geom.h geom_io.c Message-ID: <25334.1149569429@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:13:22 -0000." <200606052113.k55LDMks055707@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200606052113.k55LDMks055707@repoman.freebsd.org>, Pawel Jakub Dawid ek writes: > Add g_duplicate_bio() function which does the same thing what g_clone_bio() > is doing, but g_duplicate_bio() allocates new bio with M_WAITOK flag. First, this sounds wrong to me from an overall memory management point of view. Second, g_clone_bio_wait() had been a better name. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25334.1149569429>