Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 13:19:46 +1300 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@freebsddiary.org> To: Colin Campbell <sgcccdc@citec.qld.gov.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: two copies of bind or two name servers? Message-ID: <200001050019.NAA60462@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001050929480.2370-100000@guru.citec.qld.gov.au> References: <200001041035.XAA56537@ducky.nz.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks colin. On 5 Jan 00, at 9:37, Colin Campbell wrote: > internal dns > - bind to 127.0.0.1 and internal interface > - forward to external interface At first I was getting: opensocket_f: bind([0.0.0.0].53): Address already in use Then I removed: query-source address * port 53; > external dns > - binds to external interface > - forward to isp > > resolver > - point to 127.0.0.1 or internal interface Seems to be fine here. However, I'm still partial to running named on two boxes. But that it yet to be decided. -- Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited [I'm looking for more work] The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.freebsddiary.org/freebsd/ NZ FreeBSD User Group - http://www.nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/ The Racing System - http://www.racingsystem.com/racingsystem.htm unix @ home - http://www.unixathome.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001050019.NAA60462>