Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:59:30 +0200 From: peter.blok@bsd4all.org To: Ernie Luzar <luzar722@gmail.com> Cc: Pavel Timofeev <timp87@gmail.com>, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: VNET branch destiny Message-ID: <B1769A72-69F1-4850-AA2B-A61EE5648DE2@bsd4all.org> In-Reply-To: <58EBE6E6.8060008@gmail.com> References: <CAAoTqfuAvZfoC-j8JFTvrpxqFMM5DjxyDXgMhMZLj3DO2pCYTw@mail.gmail.com> <0136F3BE-4B47-4677-8D81-3FE0F5E67E79@lists.zabbadoz.net> <CAAoTqfvJ013NTQB75JeVCysfk-xk-hac-f73gXfvCt5bBo_QXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAoTqfuQXvKAQNOwshY5mkt0dG7Z1jKC6Aae9TF4hum1aUrJsA@mail.gmail.com> <24B3E322-5B92-470D-A1D6-10DF8EF79490@bsd4all.org> <58EB8D98.5050904@gmail.com> <75BD8407-83AC-4383-912A-70083CED3FFD@bsd4all.org> <58EBE6E6.8060008@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
No problem. Although pf is not used the vnet_destroy seems to be the = issue. Some parts are not virtualized and the = vnet_destroy->vnet_pf_uninit teardown happens on the host vnet so to = speak. > On 10 Apr 2017, at 22:11, Ernie Luzar <luzar722@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > peter.blok@bsd4all.org wrote: >> Well, in my case it panic=E2=80=99ed on 11-stable. I=E2=80=99m only = using pf on the host, not in the jail. I=E2=80=99m using Devin Teske=E2=80= =99s jng to create a netgraph bridge. It is my intention to use the = netgrpah bridge with bhyve as well. >=20 >=20 > I also tested using Devin Teske=E2=80=99s jng to create a netgraph = bridge on > RELEASE 10.0 and it worked. But when I tried the same configuration on > RELEASE 11.0 it no longer worked. >=20 > Sorry for the noise. I missed this sentence. "I=E2=80=99m only using = pf on the > host, not in the jail.". Thats what happens when I answer email after = a long day at work. >=20 >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B1769A72-69F1-4850-AA2B-A61EE5648DE2>