Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 16:32:46 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@westhill.cdrom.com> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@freefall.freebsd.org>, CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrsbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src collect.c Message-ID: <10047.816913966@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 20 Nov 1995 15:36:55 PST." <1282.816910615@westhill.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think it's time to review commit policy in -stable now that the release is out. I certainly wouldn't mind a more relaxed approach to letting any of the commiters bring the really obvious fixes over. This would include docs, etc.. I would consider 2.1-stable now a branch for putting all the fixes we would have really loved to have seen go into 2.1 but must now live with being in 2.1.1. Jordan > Peter Wemm wrote in message ID > <199511202332.PAA23784@freefall.freebsd.org>: > > peter 95/11/20 15:32:26 > > > Modified: usr.sbin/sendmail/src collect.c > > Log: > > If sendmail is collecting a message *not* via SMTP, then this patch will > > turn off the read data block timeouts. This was inspired by the same fix > > in sendmail-8.7, but the code in this area is somewhat different. (8.7 > > is much more sensible). This will stop the infamous > > "timeout waiting for input during message body read" on long running jobs , > > eg: /etc/daily | mail root. > > Any chance of this going into the 2.1 branch? > > Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10047.816913966>