Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:09:46 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: geom 'taste' vs. manual creation ? Message-ID: <gki3r5$q3u$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20090113122111.GA89189@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <20090113122111.GA89189@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF456D84D5B3D03809C7CE80C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Luigi Rizzo wrote: > geom(4) says: >=20 > A geom which came into being as a result of a normal taste operation= > should self-destruct... >=20 > Now I wonder: > does the GEOM infrastructure record whether a geom has been created > by a 'taste' call, or manually through a 'geom xxx create ..', or > this info should be managed directly by the individual implementation ?= I'm not sure if this is what you're asking, but when a new geom is created (for example by a complex / transformation GEOM class...), it is automatically tested again, so why would it be different now? --------------enigF456D84D5B3D03809C7CE80C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJbJKaldnAQVacBcgRAnGoAKDbJ8bHI27Om+0z8JQaA2T8bezyCwCggTzq mTSHkrhY1QBTW3O05E7324w= =Dfrm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF456D84D5B3D03809C7CE80C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?gki3r5$q3u$1>