Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:38:01 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Simon Barner <barner@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: another gcc 4.2 breakage? Message-ID: <20071017183801.GA420@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20071017143652.GA2751@dose.local.invalid> References: <471543CA.70409@protected-networks.net> <47154750.1080109@FreeBSD.org> <20071017143652.GA2751@dose.local.invalid>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:36:52PM +0200, Simon Barner wrote: > I have a compile fix for this problem -- the resulting binary dumps > core though. I can commit the fix and mark the port IGNORE on RELENG_7 > until we have a proper solution. Why be that drastic? Just require GCC=3.4 -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071017183801.GA420>