Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:04:33 -0800
From:      David Kirchner <dpk@dpk.net>
To:        Barkley Vowk <bvowk@math.ualberta.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Filesystems >1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).
Message-ID:  <35c231bf0511091204t60817b15v6934e41323f4060a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051109113648.D3622@3jane.math.ualberta.ca>
References:  <20051109113648.D3622@3jane.math.ualberta.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/9/05, Barkley Vowk <bvowk@math.ualberta.ca> wrote:
> I've got a 3TB (7 x 500GB w/ hot-spare) array on an areca board in amd64.
>
> Under 5.4-R I could have >1TB filesystems without an issue. I recall not
> having problems with 6.0-BETA5 too.
>
> However, 6.0-R gives me a tragic:
>
> /dev/da0s1d    723G     54G    611G     8%    /home
>
> Certainly not what I was hoping for.
>
> I've tried both i386 and amd64 releases.
>
> Especially since that apparent limit is much smaller than 1TB.

Curious. Is there any remaining space for a second slice, as in da0s2?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35c231bf0511091204t60817b15v6934e41323f4060a>