Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:26:16 -0500
From:      Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu>
To:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Minimal skills
Message-ID:  <B7C2E20B-408E-4AEB-B3E1-785981995C19@kicp.uchicago.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CAGBxaX=A0FkFW35VK6t8YNxHVVT0XvfCBeRMBN1BnqojwVv7Fw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <mailman.5421.1591424554.4503.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <a7f9a8b5-29b1-c083-e82d-92192c2f3c9e@defert.com> <CAGBxaX=B3ieSMnFyQ__NyQ=OVoz53c06RVsa-jap6GR6r0Y7Ew@mail.gmail.com> <C49F5FB7-37F5-4A49-ADA2-16490089CFDC@kicp.uchicago.edu> <CAGBxaXmVAMv12B09XbCGPw6=NBXiyzKOz2w9j1tut-x9t8NEQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEC73915Obkz2aNme3LZu6%2BJF3FLQER813-8%2BLFg9PKMMet3Lg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGBxaX=A0FkFW35VK6t8YNxHVVT0XvfCBeRMBN1BnqojwVv7Fw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On Jun 7, 2020, at 1:59 PM, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:48 PM Donald Wilde <dwilde1@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>> On 6/7/20, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:46 PM Valeri Galtsev =
<galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu
>>>=20
>>> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>> On Jun 6, 2020, at 8:17 PM, Aryeh Friedman =
<aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 5:06 AM Vincent DEFERT <20.100@defert.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> My advice: NEVER, ever, learn Java, for if you do, you'll never =
want
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> use another language and that could be a handicap in a new
>> developer's
>>>>>> career.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>> I switched 10 years ago to Java after 15 years of C/C++ (and an =
odd
>>>>> assortment of other languages) and certainly agree with the idea =
of
>> not
>>>>> wanting to use another language.     Think of Java as the family =
SUV,
>>>>> not
>>>>> particularly fast and nimble when you need high performance or =
very
>> low
>>>>> level work but what is it good for nothing is better (rock solid =
code
>>>> that
>>>>> doesn't require the above).   That being said you should learn it =
but
>>>> learn
>>>>> it with other languages.
>>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> To the OP:
>>>>=20
>>>> As someone already said in this thread: Java is proprietary, and =
Oracle
>>>> who bought out Sun Microsystems (the creator of Java) started =
charging
>>>> money end users of applications written in Java.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>> Where on Earth did you get the idea that Oracle charges/gets =
royalties
>> for
>>> 3rd application in Java!?!?!??!?!? I have *NEVER* paid a dime for =
any
>>> application and/or anything else written in Java (nor is there any
>> language
>>> in the legal material that comes with the language and/or any of the
>> tools
>>> that would even allow for a royalty)... the language spec is =
completely
>>> open and anyone can write a compiler or a JVM (all the specs are
>> completely
>>> available)..... IBM has made one so have a few other people =
including
>> GNU.
>>>=20
>> You can use java 8 for your own purposes but Oracle's license
>> agreement on their website clearly states that only up until Java 7 =
is
>> it truly free. :-( This change occurred several years ago now.
>>=20
>> I don't have time to get the citation to support Valeri's assertion,
>> but it is true.
>>=20
>=20
> Then Wikipedia MUST be wrong?  A direct quote from there article on =
OpenJDK
> (1st paragraph): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenJDK
>=20
> "OpenJDK (Open Java Development Kit) is a free and open-source
> implementation of the Java Platform, Standard Edition (Java SE).[1] It =
is
> the result of an effort Sun Microsystems began in 2006. The =
implementation
> is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL) version 2 =
with a
> linking exception. Were it not for the GPL linking exception, =
components
> that linked to the Java class library would be subject to the terms of =
the
> GPL license. OpenJDK is the official reference implementation of Java =
SE
> since version 7.[2][3][4]"
>=20
> And from the the OpenJDK web site itself:
>=20
> "Will Oracle change the OpenJDK licensing model?
>=20
> No. The OpenJDK Community continues to thrive with contributions from
> Oracle, as well as other companies, researchers, and individuals, and =
the
> GPL-based licensing model is one large part of this success. Oracle =
has no
> plans to change it."  https://openjdk.java.net/faq/
>=20
> As to the language spec license and jvm spec license:
>=20
> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se14/html/spec-license.html
> (Apache derived license due to needing the patent infringement =
clause).
> [There are no patents that pertain to Java per se]
>=20

This is just general thought not addressed to anyone in particular.

For the moment it indeed is true that openjdk is free. While Sun =
Microsystems was behind Java I was quite certain there will be no =
changes neither for end user use of Java, not for openjdk. Sun =
Microsystem did have that reputation (at least, in my book). Oracle has =
different reputation (again, in my book). And charging end users of java =
applications was not a surprise for me. I am not saying openjdk will =
have the same faith, but if that happens, it will not come as a surprise =
for me.

Now, it is everybody=E2=80=99s own judgement people should rely on in =
estimate of how useful their skills in programming in Java may be in =
some future to come. They still may be valuable even if you shift your =
field out of open source domain, so do your own thinking.

Just my 2 cents, as always.

Valeri

>=20
> --=20
> Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to =
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B7C2E20B-408E-4AEB-B3E1-785981995C19>