Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus
Message-ID:  <200310101730.h9AHULoJ098537@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/57824; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 miibus
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:28:51 +0400 (MSD)

 [...]
 >  > I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9.
 >
 >  Erm... What do you mean, 'wait'?  What Tom is saying is that
 >  the branch currently referred to as -STABLE, which *is* what was
 >  formerly known as 4.8-STABLE, but is right now called 4.9-RC due
 >  to the pending 4.9-RELEASE -- well, that branch already documents
 >  that ed needs miibus.  I can also confirm that: my ed(4) manpage
 >  shows 'device miibus' in the synopsis section.
 >
 >  This was already MFC'd in ed.4 rev. 1.19.2.10 from February 17th,
 >  committed by - surprise, surprise - Tom Rhodes :)
 
 You are quite right :-)
 
 -- 
 Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310101730.h9AHULoJ098537>