Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 22:59:29 +0300 (EEST) From: Penisoara Adrian <ady@warp.starnets.ro> To: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@roguetrader.com> Cc: John-David Childs <jdc@denver.net>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: upgrading to a safe BIND? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970718225326.3349A-100000@ady.warp.starnets.ro> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970718131613.29172B-100000@roguetrader.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi ! On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, Brandon Gillespie wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, John-David Childs wrote: > > > work? What differs between the bind distributed with FreeBSD and the bind > > > at isc.org? > > > > I compiled 8..1.1 on FreeBSD 2.2.2 last week. It compiles out of the box. > > THe primary differences are that FreeBSD puts some of the binaries in > > different places than isc does (e.g. /usr/bin vs. /usr/sbin) and that the > > isc man pages go in /usr/share/man/cat* instead of /usr/share/man/man* > > Why don't we ship FreeBSD with bind-8? From what I've read, it seems like > the better of the two.. I stick with bind-8 too ! bind-4 is maintained only for 'compatibility' while bind-8 is the official developement kit... Now I'd surely like to see 'jkh@time.cdrom.com' signature after "named 8.1.1" ... don't you Jordan ? :) No offence. > > -Brandon Gillespie > > Ady (@warp.starnets.ro)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970718225326.3349A-100000>