Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:55:27 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely5.cicely.de> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: something funny with soft updates? Message-ID: <20020628145526.GS14535@cicely5.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0206280218440.72967-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0206280218440.72967-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 02:27:30AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > I did a small test today to try test the speed impact of > the KSE test. > during this, I noticed that soft updates is not having it's usual > performance increaseing effect.. > > Normal kernel, soft updates: > 1387.881u 603.392s 35:48.63 92.6% 2694+2248k 12424+3310io 3587pf+0w > KSE kernel, soft updates: > 1385.979u 605.575s 35:21.41 93.8% 2695+2252k 11558+3300io 3705pf+0w > Normal kernel, NO softupdates: > 1389.803u 594.961s 35:59.14 91.9% 2697+2248k 11839+66940io 3701pf+0w You measured it - great. After updating an -current alpha I had the strong impression that a cvs update was much slower than before. The timerange of my update was 17th to 21st June. I did not notice a slowdown with the 17th kernel, but I'm not absolutely shure either. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020628145526.GS14535>