Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 01:54:48 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> To: Nick Nauwelaerts <nick@wanadoo.be> Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD's tar susceptible to this? Message-ID: <20021002085448.GA67610@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20021002104203.3abf8486.nick@wanadoo.be> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20021001104558.00d3f900@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20021001113225.034331b0@localhost> <20021002104203.3abf8486.nick@wanadoo.be>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 10:42:03AM +0200, Nick Nauwelaerts wrote: > On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 11:35:03 -0600 > Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> wrote: >=20 > > Unfortunately, GNU tar has become so pervasive > > that even OpenBSD (which avoids GNU software) uses > > it. Gotta break this dependency upon GPLed code. >=20 > FreeBSD's, NetBSD's & OpenBSD's tar/pax is BSD licensed, not GLPed. This thread is off-topic. Please restrain yourself from continuing the discussion in this forum. Kris --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9mrRYWry0BWjoQKURAqxYAKCEQqsuFwmzYc/SBzsJEGkEfdvkiACg7J3l OKBPxoaky1AD+3P3db4jSrE= =ZsoO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021002085448.GA67610>