Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:57:50 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.6 release schedule. Message-ID: <19980123145750.59255@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <199801230308.DAA00632@awfulhak.org>; from Brian Somers on Fri, Jan 23, 1998 at 03:08:46AM %2B0000 References: <4618.884958736@time.cdrom.com> <199801230308.DAA00632@awfulhak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 23, 1998 at 03:08:46AM +0000, Brian Somers wrote: > > 2.2.5 was released early last November and that means that our > > quarterly release schedule points at the end of February as the target > > release date. > [.....] > > This begs the question; how to people feel about the latest ppp > sources going into -stable. It's undergone a *lot* of work, the main > changes being the security model (now more flexible), deflate > compression, M$ Chap (without hurting the release crunch stuff), lots > of overflow bugs fixed, lots of routing table limits removed, random > IP allocation and external chat(8) capabilities. Those overflow fixes more or less have to go into -stable. Besides that, I feel that you can merge all of it as long as it works, but I'm not The Powers That Be ;-) Eivind.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980123145750.59255>