Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:30:11 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Lcdproc] LCDProc CVS + PicoLCD on FreeBSD Message-ID: <24019.1232155811@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:37:52 EST." <F2B6C026-25FB-4789-A2C1-A42CF4263B9E@siliconlandmark.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <F2B6C026-25FB-4789-A2C1-A42CF4263B9E@siliconlandmark.com>, Andre Gu ibert de Bruet writes: >>>> ...but... they *are* HID devices. Why is this "unfortunate"? >> >> It's unfortunate, because they are HID devices only because that >> is what microchip.com supplies as a USB programming example. >> >> The actual protocol they talk has nothing to do with the HID >> specification. > >PHK - I see that you committed the quirk for the 2X20. Would you mind >committing the patch attached to PR usb/128803? Do you want me to >produce the bits required for usb2 as well? USB2 patches should go to HPS@ still I think ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24019.1232155811>