Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:13:20 +0200 From: "Cedric GROSS" <cg@cgross.info> To: "'Adrian Chadd'" <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [IWN] Review Message-ID: <003101ceca4f$fea3fc30$fbebf490$@info> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomWAMEEie8zK=p6Z=X%2BgDb71Y7nzyuh_upeKZZ%2BADsaDw@mail.gmail.com> References: <002701cebc6f$634c0040$29e400c0$@info> <CAJ-VmonSS9Y9X0=3XndD-JX6boSW7NcGXwyv0Ra3e5%2B0UEaUhg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmom_YD-1p85hNfAQBte9AjfZ7N6U-=%2B%2Bc4qw9VZcSKB66g@mail.gmail.com> <003301cebdeb$fc941350$f5bc39f0$@info> <1381762883.2593.0.camel@localhost> <002e01cec8f0$71c400e0$554c02a0$@info> <CAJ-VmomWAMEEie8zK=p6Z=X%2BgDb71Y7nzyuh_upeKZZ%2BADsaDw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Adrian, =20 It=92s up to you. If you wish to continue commit small part review split_6, split_7 and split_8. Or directly test and commit split_8. =20 >From split_8, it=92s remaining Sean=92s work : - Led management - Power supply management =20 After that, freebsd repo will be at same level as my github repo.=20 And may be will able to work on improving speed and add hostap mode. =20 Cedric =20 =20 De : adrian.chadd@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.chadd@gmail.com] De la part = de Adrian Chadd Envoy=E9 : mercredi 16 octobre 2013 06:56 =C0 : Cedric GROSS Cc : Sean Bruno; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Objet : Re: [IWN] Review =20 Ok, so what, I should test out split_8, get that into the tree, then = merge in more stuff from you? =20 =20 -adrian =20 =20 On 14 October 2013 08:17, Cedric GROSS <cg@cgross.info> wrote: > De : Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_bruno@yahoo.com] > =C0 : Cedric GROSS > Cc : 'Adrian Chadd'; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org > Objet : RE: [IWN] Review > > On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote: > > Hello, > > I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now. > > > > So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD. > > Cedric > > Cedric: Hi Sean, > > Which branch should we be testing? > As Adrian wish to smoothly include changes into FreeBSD repo, split_6 an split_7 doesn't change big things regarding latest NIC. Instead Split_8, is minimal version for managing 2200 and so on NIC = series. Could be a good idea to test this version with =E0 lot of NIC. > sean Thanks Cedric =20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003101ceca4f$fea3fc30$fbebf490$>