Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:29:34 +0300 From: Yuri Pankov <yp@xvoid.org> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, Clay Daniels <clay.daniels.jr@gmail.com>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 13.0-CURRENT r356767 wanted ZFS Message-ID: <59e98ff2-57c2-f618-643b-f73436149061@xvoid.org> In-Reply-To: <20200117002639.GM1192@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <CAGLDxTWe1BmiH5og0ZS1_RL%2BsLB3Ww48dwOSwmQ6GjPB0yrAHg@mail.gmail.com> <20200117002639.GM1192@albert.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Wolfskill wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:18:41AM +0000, Clay Daniels wrote: >> 13.0-CURRENT r356767 would not take NO for an answer, and kept up a loop >> until I gave up trying to use UFS. No big deal, seems to work fine... >> >> Clay >> .... > > Err...? Is there some additional context that I'm missing? > > I've been tracking head daily for ... longer than I really want to > think about, including on at least one system that has no ZFS file > systems; the last couple of smoke-tests were at: > > FreeBSD g1-53.catwhisker.org 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #7 r356758M/356758: Wed Jan 15 03:49:49 PST 2020 root@g1-53.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY amd64 1300076 1300076 > > and > > FreeBSD g1-53.catwhisker.org 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #8 r356786M/356787: Thu Jan 16 03:56:45 PST 2020 root@g1-53.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY amd64 1300076 1300076 > > It is not clear to me at what point anything might have a chance > to indicate that it "wanted ZFS" and request an action. Likely it's about the latest 13.0-CURRENT snapshot image (r356767) and the change to bsdinstall to make ZFS default partitioning scheme, now discussed on arch@.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59e98ff2-57c2-f618-643b-f73436149061>